The contribution of the lower classes in the liberation war of Bangladesh.(Part-4)

    The contribution of the lower classes in the liberation war of Bangladesh:

(Part-4)

However, along with the historians of all these movements, the overall idea of ​​the movement is not found in it as it is supported and biased by Soccer. However, in all these rallies, although there was a group consciousness, the nationalist consciousness was not evident. They were often run on the advice of oppressed zamindars and feudal lords. As a result, the course of their movement would change and the feudal heroes would enjoy its benefits. Almost everything from financial benefits to fame would go to them. The people at these rallies were completely deprived of political experience.As a result, even though their movement was against the local representatives, they obeyed the central government in theology. For these reasons, their movement never took the form of a nationalist movement and did not succeed. However, it is true that the seeds of the nationalist movement were embedded in all these movements.

After the partition of the country on the basis of biracialism in 1947, West Pakistani leaders colonized East Bengal. They continued to rule and exploit here in the style of the British East India Company. The British East India Company had no difference with them except the difference of time.

Although the war of independence of Bengalis was conducted under the great rulers of 11 sectors, it is not the achievement of those rulers and the upper class. However, keeping Bangabandhu at the center, the leadership of those upper classes is given a place in the present history and the consciousness and leadership of the marginalized people of different parts of the country including blacksmiths, fishermen, farmers, weavers, mute workers and Methar tribals are neglected.

In this way, the incidents of self-sacrifice of the lower castes described in all these histories written outside the national interest seem like a fairy tale. They are only scapegoats in that struggle, only a few victims. And so in all these biased histories we see those who have been elevated to the status of the upper class after the event. But on the eve of the movement, they too were oppressed by the Pakistanis and similarly associated with the lower classes of the country.But the information provided by history after independence has revealed all the light of the historian in the face of the upper class people at the center.

          Thanks all to read my blog