Mashrafe bin Mortaza must have seen the exclusive interview in tears. Mashrafe has said a lot about it. One of the serious allegations was about Bangladesh's T20 World Cup campaign where a director of cricket board was sent as team leader but he was not in a hotel with the team. As well as the question of whether he was sent to hang out with board money or to stay with the team as a team leader, the instability in the team with the coach, the monomalignment of the players, the distance of the steam with the board as a connecting bridge. If he doesn't do that, he will not do it if he is out of the team hotel. How to freeze it? He was not there to freeze. Made a fact finding committee
Enayet Hossain Siraj and Jalali, two directors of Bangladesh Cricket Board, are members of the committee. My question is, will there be any benefit for you from this inquiry committee? Is it really a matter of showing a person of Bangladesh Cricket Board I will discuss why I am saying this here, but by the way, the name of the board director mentioned by Mashrafe who went to the World Cup and he was not able to go out, I am not just criticizing just to criticize, of course Bangladesh Cricket Board is activated here somehow. One of the things they have to do is to find out who the fact finding committee is. That's the decent thing to do, and it should end there. Tar
What does it mean that the board can clearly understand the whole thing from that place? The directors of the cricket board have been going with the team as team leaders for the last several series. Ahmed Sajjadul Alam Bobby then went to Zimbabwe. All the board directors. They all gave a report to the Seto board. What was written as a team leader did not come out in the report. The two who have been given the responsibility will talk to him. Talk to the players. Talk to the manager. Destroy. Talk to everyone. Even the government can talk to the journalists. My question is whether it came out in public Being
Wouldn't it be possible for some documents to come out this year? I said that the New Zealand tour was a tour of Sri Lanka, then the reports on that tour were from the BCB director. It doesn't seem to me that in the end it could be that the team leader who in his report now as the team leader who was sent by the Bangladesh Cricket Board to join the team did not do that he told our music wedding that Akram Khan Fake, chairman of cricket operations and a director of the Bangladesh Cricket Board, was sent by the cricket board to visit the country. When the election is over, they have gone out and passed. Was
Akram Khan as the team leader to stay with the team, he did not stay in the same hotel with the team from that place. If Akram Khan had stayed with the team then there would have been no difference between that report and the fact finding committee report now or if I had gotten two and a half to see if anything had happened. I will make a video, I will make a video of two batsmen, I will say there, brother, I was proved wrong, the fact finding committee thing, they have brought it fine, they have found out, the real Bangladesh cricket exchanges can actually share something, then I will definitely share it with Bangladesh Cricket Board and this committee. My place is to be a public show committee. We will never know what is written in a public show report and we will talk about everything. Aki
Everyone will forget everything again. It will seem as if everything has gone well. If it feels bad then maybe the whole thing will come up again. What do you want to say?
118.506 SRY